Capital program management system

The department responsible for managing the capital assets should assist in determining the type of information to be tracked by capital asset type. The condition measures and related standards: Should be understandable and reliable May be dictated by mandated safety requirements, federal, state, or provincial funding requirements, or applicable engineering and other professional standards.

Indirect measures such a water main breaks, sewage overflows, etc. Assets near high risk areas such as hospitals may require a higher standard of performance and require a higher frequency of condition assessment. Evaluating existing capital assets to determine if they still provide the most appropriate method to deliver services.

Understanding how critical the capital asset is to the government, the likelihood and consequence of failure of that asset, and similar factors can help the government identify the true value of the asset to effective service delivery and ensure appropriate resource allocation for maintenance.

Consider developing financial policies that identify and dedicate fees or other revenue sources to help maintain the expected service levels of capital assets. Allocating sufficient funds in the multi-year capital plan and annual operations budget for the condition assessment determination and reporting, preventative maintenance, repair, renewal and replacement of capital assets in order to continue the provision of services that contribute to public health, safety, and quality of life of the public.

Each government should establish an on-going source of funds in both the multi-year capital plan and operating budget for the maintenance and renewal and replacement needs of its capital assets consistent with this best practice. Consumer Goods. Consumer Services. Education Management. Environmental Services. Events Services. Executive Office. Facilities Services. Financial Services. Fine Art. Food Production. Government Administration.

Government Relations. Graphic Design. Health, Wellness and Fitness. Higher Education. Human Resources. Import and Export. Industrial Automation. Information Services. Information Technology and Services. International Affairs.

International Trade and Development. Investment Banking. Investment Management. Law Enforcement. Law Practice. Legal Services. Legislative Office. Logistics and Supply Chain.

Management Consulting. Market Research. Marketing and Advertising. Mechanical or Industrial Engineering. Media Production. There are examples of projects that began the PHA reviews near completion of production design. This meant that implementing ISP strategies would add significant cost and delays in start-up. When the PHAs were completed, there were fewer options to manage risks.

The result was a large number of safety interlocks, operability issues, and high maintenance costs to meet current IEC and ISA safety interlock design, inspection, and test requirements. Pre-Authorization Review The objectives of this study are to review the screening PHA, review any changes in scope or design intent since the screening PHA, confirm all process-related hazards and hazardous events have been identified, help ensure that the consequences of the identified events have been assessed, and determine if the current project scope is adequate to control all of the hazards.

This assures that the project is adequately funded to control hazards. The detailed PHA includes a review of the earlier PHAs and an in-depth, systematic analysis of the process to identify and evaluate:. Lastly, it is important to develop recommendations for further process hazards elimination or control. This review is done soon after the design drawings are released. The PSSR provides a final checkpoint for new equipment to confirm that all appropriate elements of PSM have been addressed satisfactorily and that the facility is safe to start up.

For capital projects, planning for success with the pre-start-up review begins with assembling a competent project team. Effective project management, including careful planning and coordination of all PSM elements, is important to achieve a smooth start-up.

This report may be either a compilation of all the project PHAs i. This report is prepared prior to the pre-start-up safety review PSSR. Below is a brief overview of some key PSM elements that apply directly to a capital project. The process safety information package provides a description of the chemical process or operation.

It provides the foundation for identifying and understanding the hazards involved, which are the first steps in the PSM effort. The package consists of the following parts: hazards of materials, process design basis, equipment design basis.

Process safety information is critical to help ensure safe operation throughout the life of the facility. This information is needed by the PHA teams so they understand the impact of proposed changes and can perform cyclical reviews. Unfortunately, this information is very costly to reproduce if lost; therefore, permanent storage systems must be established.

It is essential that the process safety information requirements need to be built into design and procurement packages. Mechanical integrity MI covers the life of the facility from the initial installation through dismantlement. It addresses such topics as the following:.

The development of maintenance procedures and the equipment test and inspection program is a large effort, and the project team is normally responsible for developing these procedures. In DuPont, quality assurance applies to project materials, whereas quality control applies to maintenance materials.

The project team is responsible for QA, and activities may include correct specification of project materials, vendor inspections, inspections upon arrival, correct storage and preservation of project materials prior to use, and final inspection at installation. Many companies use contractors for construction of facilities. For construction activities, particularly near or within an operating unit, additional activities such as a constructability analysis are required.

This may include, for example, erection of physical barriers between operating units and construction activities. Operating procedures are prepared by the project team during the construction phase of the project after drawings have been released. They should contain all the requirements listed in OSHA In the case where operating procedures are supplied by a vendor, they should be reviewed by the project team to help ensure operability with the actual unit under construction.

These procedures are the basis for operator training. The project team is responsible for ensuring that all operating and maintenance personnel are properly trained. Initial training should include:. In manufacturing processes that contain high hazards, it is important to build a strong safety culture. Improving transparency, compliance, and collaboration across the Canada Water program, and streamlining delivery and management of information during construction and beyond.

Supporting multiple projects across programs of work to deliver greater insight and operational support. At-a-glance comparison of our license options with ability to scale as your needs and budget grow.

Free Demo. Get Pricing. BCDE Portfolio. Unlock the Power of Information.