Illegal download law new zealand

The Fair Trading Act is likely to apply, and the Consumer Guarantees Act might apply when you buy from an overseas trader. Check the trader's website for terms and conditions including return, exchange or refund policies, complaints process, and any consumer laws that apply.

It pays to use trusted international retailers and websites. These usually have good customer service if there is an issue. If you are not happy with how your data will be collected, used or stored, do not buy the product. Misleading prices or advertising. Contracts and sales agreements. The Copyright Act covers digital products. It protects original works from being used, copied or shared without the permission of the copyright owner. Sandy downloads a movie from a local online retailer onto her computer to watch later.

When she tries to watch the movie, it keeps having glitches. As it's faulty, Sandy can ask the digital provider for a refund or a free replacement under the Consumer Guarantees Act.

If a digital product doesn't work, check first if it's a problem with your device or internet connection. Check their website for how to make a complaint. There might be a complaints email address, or an online complaints form. You can also post fair and accurate feedback on their website or social media page. Give details about the issue and how your complaint was handled.

Our law centres — Community Law Centres external link. That's probably how it'll play out. Except that it's practically impossible for someone to be driving your car without you knowing about it.

Every day or so, submit a filing to the NZ Police, to the affect of: "I have reason to believe, having just reviewed my logs, that at some point on [day], a person or persons without authorization to access my WiFi probably downloaded cop. While nice in theory, it has a downside I'm originally from NZ but haven't lived there in a long time.

When I did though, I was once talking to a guy on IRC who was pretty seriously talking about doing some rather nasty things involving explosives and a jet liner While I couldn't be certain if he was serious or not, I decided to do the right thing and let the police know about it.

What happened for doing my civic duty? Well, the police turn up at my house with a search warrant citing "attempted murder and breach of the telecommunications act" interesting combo, but yes, that's what it said and took all my computers away to "investigate". Several months later, I finally got them back, with the HDD wiped on a couple and the power switch physically broken on one.

I made a complaint to the police complaints authority, but was essentially ignored the whole time. Only minor plus was I got in the Southland Times newspaper and it raised a fair bit of attention with the general public enough that people recognised me on the street for a few months.

Back on the topic at hand: If you did do something like you suggest, I'd expect similar treatment would ensue I will deal with the crime before I call the cops. I have an apparatus from my broadband provider letting me open a wifi network. I have to have some kind of 'false' security by opening my wifi by mac addresses. I have NO way of securing my wifi network as it should be.

I am not ignorant, I just can't secure my wifi network. No, tell me what i should do if this kind of stupid law come into the. Four basic choices: 1. No, tell me what i should do if this kind of stupid law come into the country i live in? Save a lot of time and hassle. Having said that, there is impetus for laws that are based on the concept that 'you can be held accountable for the actions of others'. For example, speed cameras. If your car is recorded speeding through a camera, you are legally accountable.

It is your responsibility to demonstrate that you were not behind the wheel at the time. No it's not. The burden of proof is always on the accuser. If the government fails to meet that burden and still convicts, it is tyrannical. I don't know which part of the world you're in, but the price of the ticket is as expensive as buying the DVD when it first comes out. And there I get to watch it as many times as I please, with as many pe. No sane copy write holder is going to issue notices against a school, if it was to get close to cutting off the schools internet there would be public outcry that would probably overturn or at least reopen the legislation which will have pissed off every internet user in the country no free wifi anywhere and having to prevent other who know more than them from downloading.

That hasn't stopped idiotic lawyers attempting to sue Grannies who don't own computers or single unemployed mothers. These systems are usually automated with little or no human interaction. I would expect getting damages for downloading in NZ is like getting blood out of a stone. Expecting to make a profit is just insane. We also have dynamic IPs adsl so if you reset your connection they may have to pay 50 dollars or more to get one of the 3 notices.

To automate this process is likely to loose them money. For about 3 months of. There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead. Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and take advantage of SourceForge's massive reach.

You don't even have to do the deed yourself. This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted. Full Abbreviated Hidden. More Login.

Not all bad Score: 4 , Insightful. Share twitter facebook. Re:Not all bad Score: 5 , Interesting. Parent Share twitter facebook. Re: Score: 2. IP theft, or whatever the crime is in AU. Re:Not all bad Score: 4 , Insightful. Re: Score: 3. Communism Score: 3. The parent has a point. Are you guys on the "innocent until proven guilty" standard over there? It is? Because they claim it is? What's the ISP market like? You wouldn't have to stop pirating. The law only covers peer to peer and torrent protocols, so as I recommended to my sister who lives in NZ, you just need to rely on streaming, file hosting sites and the sneakernet.

The sneakernet is where most of her piracy happens anyway. In the current situation you can not even take a step without "violating" the "imaginary property" of someone. Re:Not all bad Score: 4 , Interesting. The NSW police in Australia are being taken to court this month for pirating a few thousand copies of some terminal emulation software that really should have been replaced a decade and a half ago and is licenced at an insane price per seat for what is effectively abandonware.

So there you go, even the police force does it. Re:Not all bad Score: 4 , Informative. Pretty Quiet Score: 2. Simple Score: 5 , Insightful. So stop worrying. Re:Simple Score: 5 , Informative. It doesn't work like that at all.

Why do people in real high power approve such shit laws? Sure if we all received a nice k salary we would never ever pirate anything. Concerns have also been raised about a growing black market for tobacco. Initial plans for a smoke free generation of New Zealanders have now been finalised after public consultation. They were first floated in April.

They will still need to pass through the legislative process, but should not face any obstacles — Smokefree is a headline Labour policy, and the party holds a majority in New Zealand parliament. Verrall said the legislation would be introduced in , with the age limits coming in in Sounds good in theory but you get put on the very bottom priority level for bandwidth and if you go over moderate usage they traffic shape you into the ground.

Its ok in some areas but get any decently congested exchange and it turns into dialup really fast. You also have the fun of actually trying to deal with slingshot if something goes wrong which will have you waiting on hold for two hours at any time to get to their lowest level of helpdesk.

Totally agree, another New Zealander here, for a country that keeps BSing on and on about wanting to be a technological powerhouse the government does a damn good job trying to supress technology. They let companies like Telecom cap bandwidth to the point that it cripples net use and add so much additional tax on technology items that they can easily cost double what they cost in other countries. They are so proud of their fibre to the home plan which will take decades to deliver outdated tech and they have.

When people stopped downloading illegal content over your narrow pipe I bet there will be a lot more available bandwidth you to download the legitimate content you've been waiting for! Of course they don't! That regular people ever got access to the Internet was a surprise to most companies.

Look at the way the telecoms are scrambling to take ownership of the Internet. The only reason we ever had a public Internet is that it was developed by. Plus there were additional charges for other activities on there.

Local bands regularly make up a fair portion of the charts. Yeh, because everyone knows that illegally downloading things is also known is "culture". Not the culture of downloading or purchasing. The only culture you're allowed, is the one that you're told to like. Much like Canada, with Cancon. And if you're not paying for it, you can expect to have your net cut off. I misread this as "can expect to have your nut cut off" and my immediate thought was "will they allow you to choose which one?

All Content is Copyright by default. How do you distinguish the legal from the illegal content? In other countries they refer to the 'sharing' as the illegal part. Here in NZ it appears to be the 'downloading'. Does that mean if I watch 'RayWilliamJohnson' on youtube he can have my internet cut off? If they're talking about 'sharing' then it's certainly not very clear in their education campaign. How am I to know whether the person who posted the video has the rights to post it, or not?

IANAL but I wonder if you could mount a legal defence based on YouTube's user policies and their policing of the content they see to be doing these days. Copyright is the new enclosure of the commons. Especially not when somebody may have a personal video up on YouTube and in the background happens to be a piece of footage from a film on a TV, and the copyright owner of that piece decides to present a copyright claim.

At least there are no software patents [itwire. So free software and creative commons thrive without the impetus that is the idea of people owning applied math on a computational device. That has yet to pass the final reading and they gave no good reason for the delay I would think they are being lobbied by "people" from US.

I would think it will eventually pass though. If someone induces government ministers or departments to download your own personally created copyrighted content, you then each and collectively sue the government and it's departments to oblivion.

I haven't been able to hit 5Mbps for years it's not much, but I'm in rural New Zealand , and I've never been able to stream video in high quality, but tonight I'm totally able to. My ping is only 25ms, and I never thought it would be possible to have a ping so low. Now I can play games online! If you want to fuck with the system, all you guys down there could start generating your own damn content under the commons.

One of the nice side effects of all that DRM is it makes it significantly harder for your average user to generate t. This is because Amazon give discounts. Media in that part of the world are more expensive for not real reason. And I am talking about a digital download. I suppose the media cartel there can use higher prices, since physical good can be really more expensive, if are produced elsewhere and imported.

But theres not good reason to apply that to bits. You can h. File sharing? Most of us don't even go there anymore. Another awkward moment for justice, for being able to do the same thing but legally I have a website, but I didn't explicitly authorize NZ residents to view it.

Does that make it illegal for NZ residents to download my copywritten material just by visiting the website? Politicians and lobbyists really do live on another planet. The 'account holder needs to know what's going on even if they themselves don't do anything online So if a lowly government employee downloads a copyrighted MP3 on the government network, the government falls? The law only applies for using p2p at the the application layer. There are so may obvious ways around this but they either cost or are less convenient.

It also makes it so you are very unlikely a little less than before to be prosecuted under our general copy-write law. I would say the stupidity of discrimination against protocols makes will make piracy easier. I rent a couple of rooms in my house to students and I include free internet. I have no clue what they might be downloading on it. That way if I get sued, they can sue the empty shelf company and get nowhere. Don't know if that is a loophole or not I'd like to say yes, but as we all know, the people with lots of money and connection The people without money or connections That's probably how it'll play out.

Except that it's practically impossible for someone to be driving your car without you knowing about it. Every day or so, submit a filing to the NZ Police, to the affect of: "I have reason to believe, having just reviewed my logs, that at some point on [day], a person or persons without authorization to access my WiFi probably downloaded cop.

While nice in theory, it has a downside I'm originally from NZ but haven't lived there in a long time. When I did though, I was once talking to a guy on IRC who was pretty seriously talking about doing some rather nasty things involving explosives and a jet liner While I couldn't be certain if he was serious or not, I decided to do the right thing and let the police know about it. What happened for doing my civic duty? Well, the police turn up at my house with a search warrant citing "attempted murder and breach of the telecommunications act" interesting combo, but yes, that's what it said and took all my computers away to "investigate".

Several months later, I finally got them back, with the HDD wiped on a couple and the power switch physically broken on one. I made a complaint to the police complaints authority, but was essentially ignored the whole time. Only minor plus was I got in the Southland Times newspaper and it raised a fair bit of attention with the general public enough that people recognised me on the street for a few months. Back on the topic at hand: If you did do something like you suggest, I'd expect similar treatment would ensue I will deal with the crime before I call the cops.